Comments on: Educate Nic: Clean Coal http://postgreen.com/2008/05/educate-nic-clean-coal/ Eco-modern homes for the rest of us Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:07:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Nic Darling http://postgreen.com/2008/05/educate-nic-clean-coal/comment-page-1/#comment-48 Nic Darling Tue, 27 May 2008 14:58:00 +0000 http://postgreen.com/2008/05/23/educate-nic-clean-coal/#comment-48 Thanks for the comment and the links. I found the carbon capture article particularly interesting. There is a sense of realism to the approach that I enjoy. I agree with you. Increase efficiency, decrease use and do everything you can to repair the damage already done. Thanks for the comment and the links. I found the carbon capture article particularly interesting. There is a sense of realism to the approach that I enjoy.

I agree with you. Increase efficiency, decrease use and do everything you can to repair the damage already done.

]]> By: Rob Rickey http://postgreen.com/2008/05/educate-nic-clean-coal/comment-page-1/#comment-47 Rob Rickey Tue, 27 May 2008 07:29:09 +0000 http://postgreen.com/2008/05/23/educate-nic-clean-coal/#comment-47 There are two fine minds at work on this: Ed Mazria and Wallace Broeker. Mazria says "no coal" and Broeker says "carbon capture". Broeker's point is that we will never stop China and the US from using their cheap coal and we must find a way out. Mazria doubts that there is enough time to find the technology. I say support both; reduce, reduce and reduce some more, while funding research into carbon capture- maybe we could transfer investment in a few weapons systems in order to save civilization? http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/may/24/carbonemissions.climatechange1 http://www.architecture2030.org/2030_challenge/index.html There are two fine minds at work on this: Ed Mazria and Wallace Broeker. Mazria says “no coal” and Broeker says “carbon capture”. Broeker’s point is that we will never stop China and the US from using their cheap coal and we must find a way out. Mazria doubts that there is enough time to find the technology. I say support both; reduce, reduce and reduce some more, while funding research into carbon capture- maybe we could transfer investment in a few weapons systems in order to save civilization?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/may/24/carbonemissions.climatechange1
http://www.architecture2030.org/2030_challenge/index.html

]]>